M.D. ex rel. S.D. v. Office of Administrative Hearings
This text of 332 F. App'x 368 (M.D. ex rel. S.D. v. Office of Administrative Hearings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
M.D. appeals the district court’s denial of his partial summary judgment motion. We affirm.
We review the district court’s summary judgment order de novo. Regula v. Delta Family-Care Disability Survivorship Plan, 266 F.3d 1130, 1138 (9th Cir.2001). Neither 20 U.S.C. § 1415 nor Cal.Code Regs. tit. 5, § 3087 required, nor was there an agreement between the parties, that the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) incorporate the terms of a settlement pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(D)(i) into its order of dismissal.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 F. App'x 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/md-ex-rel-sd-v-office-of-administrative-hearings-ca9-2009.