McWilliams v. Windham

1 Ga. L. Rep. 406
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 1, 1886·Published

Opinion

Hall, J.

The judgment rendered when this case was formerly here (65 Ga., 109) effectually disposes of the present bill of exceptions. The record in that case covered the question now urged; and if it was not - [407]*407then presented and insisted on, the failure of the party to do so is attributable solely to his own neglect, it not appearing that he was prevented from doing so by fraud, accident or mistake or by the act of his adversary. 71 Ga., 523, 641; 70 Id., 475, 553; 69 Id., 671, 754.

Robt. S. Burch; Geo. A. Carter; R. W. Freeman, for plaintiff in error. J. B. S. Davis; Bigby & Dorsey, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McWilliams v. Windham, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 406 (Ga. 1886).

1 Ga. L. Rep. 406 (McWilliams v. Windham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McWilliams v. Walthall
65 Ga. 109 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)
Woodward v. Dromgoole
71 Ga. 523 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)