McWilliams v. State

563 So. 2d 59, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 123, 1990 WL 57563
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 16, 1990
Docket6 Div. 931
StatusPublished

This text of 563 So. 2d 59 (McWilliams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McWilliams v. State, 563 So. 2d 59, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 123, 1990 WL 57563 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMILLAN, Judge.

On remand from the Alabama Supreme Court, and considering Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), this cause is due to be affirmed because all of the issues raised by appellant in his appeal lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Reed
489 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 So. 2d 59, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 123, 1990 WL 57563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcwilliams-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.