McWilliams v. State

563 So. 2d 59, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 123, 1990 WL 57563
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McWilliams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 640 So. 2d 982
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 16, 1990·No. 6 Div. 931·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMILLAN, Judge.

On remand from the Alabama Supreme Court, and considering Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), this cause is due to be affirmed because all of the issues raised by appellant in his appeal lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McWilliams v. State, 563 So. 2d 59, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 123, 1990 WL 57563 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 59 (McWilliams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Reed
489 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1989)