McWilliams v. Plumlee

Missouri Court of Appeals

McWilliams v. Plumlee

557 S.W.3d 540

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 9, 2018

DocketWD 81078

StatusPublished

This text of 557 S.W.3d 540 (McWilliams v. Plumlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McWilliams v. Plumlee, 557 S.W.3d 540 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Michelle Plumlee (Wife) appeals the denial of her motion to modify an Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order (Amended QDRO) awarding her 3.675% of James McWilliams's (Husband's) Ford Retirement Pension. In her sole point on appeal, Wife argues that the motion court erred in refusing to modify the Amended QDRO to quantify her 3.675% monthly share of the Pension by replacing the percentage with a specific dollar amount equaling that share. Because we conclude that the terms of the Amended QDRO effectuate the express intent of the parties' dissolution judgment, and thus the motion *541court did not err in denying Wife's motion, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Michelle Plumlee (Wife) appeals the denial of her motion to modify an Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order (Amended QDRO) awarding her 3.675% of James McWilliams's (Husband's) Ford Retirement Pension. In her sole point on appeal, Wife argues that the motion court erred in refusing to modify the Amended QDRO to quantify her 3.675% monthly share of the Pension by replacing the percentage with a specific dollar amount equaling that share. Because we conclude that the terms of the Amended QDRO effectuate the express intent of the parties' dissolution judgment, and thus the motion *541court did not err in denying Wife's motion, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

557 S.W.3d 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcwilliams-v-plumlee-moctapp-2018.