McWilliams v. New York City Commission on Human Rights
This text of 239 A.D.2d 105 (McWilliams v. New York City Commission on Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered September 26, 1996, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The action was properly dismissed as against the New York City Commission on Human Rights, which cannot be held liable for any injurious consequences resulting from its allegedly negligent investigation and hearing of plaintiff’s discrimination complaint (see, Tango v Tulevech, 61 NY2d 34). As against the New York City Board of Education, plaintiff’s allegations that it failed to provide him and the Commission with his personnel records failed to state a cause of action. We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D.2d 105, 656 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4471, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcwilliams-v-new-york-city-commission-on-human-rights-nyappdiv-1997.