McWilliams v. New York City Commission on Human Rights

239 A.D.2d 105, 656 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4471, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,843
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 1, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered September 26, 1996, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action was properly dismissed as against the New York City Commission on Human Rights, which cannot be held liable for any injurious consequences resulting from its allegedly negligent investigation and hearing of plaintiff’s discrimination complaint (see, Tango v Tulevech, 61 NY2d 34). As against the New York City Board of Education, plaintiff’s allegations that it failed to provide him and the Commission with his personnel records failed to state a cause of action. We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McWilliams v. New York City Commission on Human Rights, 239 A.D.2d 105, 656 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4471, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

239 A.D.2d 105 (McWilliams v. New York City Commission on Human Rights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicholson v. State
23 Misc. 3d 313 (New York State Court of Claims, 2008)
365 West End LLC v. New York City Department of Environmental Protection
195 Misc. 2d 505 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2003)
Weitz v. State
182 Misc. 2d 320 (New York State Court of Claims, 1999)