McWilliams v. Michel

43 La. Ann. 984
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 15, 1891·No. No. 1417·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinions

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McEnery, J.

The defendants move to dismiss this appeal on the ground of want of jurisdiction rations materias, and that the plaintiff had applied for and obtained in open court an order of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

The amount in dispute is over two thousand dollars. This is apparent from the admission of defendants in their application to bond in the injunction proceeding. The order of appeal to the Court of Appeals was a nullity. The error of plaintiff in applying for and Obtaining an order of appeal to that court can not estop him from prosecuting his appeal and lodging it in the court having jurisdiction of the matters involved.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McWilliams v. Michel, 43 La. Ann. 984 (La. 1891).

43 La. Ann. 984 (McWilliams v. Michel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Barber
78 So. 2d 60 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1955)
Vaughn v. American Bank & Trust Co.
66 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1953)
Gilmore v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co.
71 So. 536 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
Cordill v. Quaker Realty Co.
58 So. 819 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1912)
McCrory v. Bradford
57 So. 892 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1912)
In re Sheehy
44 So. 315 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)
Gilmore v. Schenck
39 So. 40 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)
Posey v. City of New Orleans
37 So. 969 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)
Kellogg v. McFatter
36 So. 112 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)
Coburn v. Board of Com'rs
74 N.W. 1026 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1898)
Vordermark v. Wilkinson
46 N.E. 336 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1897)
Land Trust of Indianapolis v. Hoffman
57 F. 333 (Fifth Circuit, 1893)