McWilliams v. McWilliams

144 S.E. 286, 166 Ga. 792, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 405
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 18, 1928
DocketNo. 6380
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 S.E. 286 (McWilliams v. McWilliams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McWilliams v. McWilliams, 144 S.E. 286, 166 Ga. 792, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 405 (Ga. 1928).

Opinion

Atkustsoh, J.

The exception is to a judgment overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, in a suit for specific performance of an alleged parol contract for an undivided third interest in described realty. Held:

1. The fourth, fifth, and sixth grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the exclusion of evidence offered by the plaintiff, show no error.

2. The excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in the seventh ground of the motion for a new trial, was not erroneous as against the plaintiff.

3. The verdict for the defendant was authorized by the evidence, and the judge did not err in refusing, a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. J. Barge, for plaintiff. L. S. Gamp, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Marietta v. Glover
167 S.E.2d 649 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.E. 286, 166 Ga. 792, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcwilliams-v-mcwilliams-ga-1928.