McWilliams v. Ft. Stockton Irrigated Lands Co.

156 S.W. 556, 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 740
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 24, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 156 S.W. 556 (McWilliams v. Ft. Stockton Irrigated Lands Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McWilliams v. Ft. Stockton Irrigated Lands Co., 156 S.W. 556, 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 740 (Tex. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

HARPER, C. J.

J. F. McWilliams, real estate agent, brought this suit for commissions for furnishing purchaser for certain tracts of land belonging to the defendant, Ft. Stockton Irrigated Lands Company.

On February 5, 1913, the statement of facts filed was stricken from the files, because not in compliance with rules 72 to 78 prescribed by the Supreme Court, for the reasons given in Albers v. Roberts, 150 S. W. 596.

The errors assigned in the appellant’s brief will not be considered, because they all relate to the charge of the court or to the admissibility of evidence, and they cannot be considered in the absence of statement of facts. Mayo v. Goldman, 44 Tex. Civ. App. 80, 97 S. W. 1061; Boyette v. Glass, 140 S. W. 819.

*557 There being no fundamental error apparent upon the face of the record, the cause must be ¿farmed; and it is so ordered.

McKENZIE, j., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston Electric Co. v. Schmidt
244 S.W. 1110 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Leonard v. Caruthers
236 S.W. 189 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Texas Company v. W.H. Daugherty
176 S.W. 717 (Texas Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 S.W. 556, 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcwilliams-v-ft-stockton-irrigated-lands-co-texapp-1913.