McWilliams Transit, Inc. v. Henjes Marine, Inc.

130 F.2d 201, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3070, 1942 A.M.C. 1051
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 1942
DocketNo. 312
StatusPublished

This text of 130 F.2d 201 (McWilliams Transit, Inc. v. Henjes Marine, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McWilliams Transit, Inc. v. Henjes Marine, Inc., 130 F.2d 201, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3070, 1942 A.M.C. 1051 (2d Cir. 1942).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We can see no reason for saying that the findings of fact in this case were “clearly erroneous.” If the barge had been as stout as was necessary for the service on which she was engaged, there is no reason to suppose that the wind and seas to which she was exposed would have produced the injuries she suffered, for the weather was of the kind likely to be encountered on any day in January. We have so often declared that we would not review findings of fact in these cases that it surprises us that so many patently fruitless appeals continue to be taken.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 F.2d 201, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3070, 1942 A.M.C. 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcwilliams-transit-inc-v-henjes-marine-inc-ca2-1942.