McWhorter v. McMurrain

26 Ga. 164
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1858
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ga. 164 (McWhorter v. McMurrain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McWhorter v. McMurrain, 26 Ga. 164 (Ga. 1858).

Opinion

By the Court

Penning J.

delivering the opinion.

A j udgment granting a new trial, is not final. When, therefore, the Court in which a verdict is rendered is dissatisfied with the verdict, and grants a new trial, the grant will not be disturbed by a reviewing Court, except in an extreme case.

Audit must be admitted, that the present case comes vory [167]*167near to an extreme case. Indeed, as the case stands, ii comes quite to it. As the case stands, there is no affidavit of the truth of the plea; none of an expectation of ability to prove the plea on a new trial.

Therefore, we can only conditionally, affirm the judgment granting the new trial; namely on condition, that an affidavit of these two things be filed in the Court below by McMurrain within a reasonable time, to be judged of by that Court.

Judgment affirmed conditionally.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ga. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcwhorter-v-mcmurrain-ga-1858.