McWhorter v. Beavers
This text of 8 Ga. 300 (McWhorter v. Beavers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
[302]*302There is no warranty of title to the purchaser, implied, on the part of the defendant in execution, or by the Sheriff. The maxim of caveat emptor applies to the purchaser of property at such sales. The Monte Allegre Tenant claimant, 9 Wheaton’s Reports, 616. Yates vs. Bond, 2 McCord’s Reps. 382. Murphy vs. Higginbottom, 2 Hill’s S. C. Rep. 397.
From the facts in this case, the plaintiff below cannot maintain ‘his action on the ground, of mistake. Davis vs. Hunt, 2 Bailey’s Rep. 418. Neither can the plaintiff recover, for so much money paid to the use of the defendant in execution, for the reason that the property was seized and sold, against his will, and there exists no privity in law, between the defendant in execution, and the purchaser at Sheriff’s sale, inasmuch as there was no warranty of title, either express or implied.
Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ga. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcwhorter-v-beavers-ga-1850.