McWhinney v. Swisher
This text of 58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 378 (McWhinney v. Swisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court:
1. The defendant in error is not, upon the facts stated, entitled to judgment for more than the proceeds of the sale of the real estate since the liability of the sureties was, by the terms of the bond, limited to that.
2. She was entitled to the judgment rendered by the circuit court in her favor, because the proceeds of the sale of the real estate came into the hands of the guardian, and they were not by him accounted for. Although he had accounted for moneys in excess of her share of such proceeds, that could not, in a suit by her upon the additional bond, be presumed to have been, in whole or in [384]*384part, on account' of such, proceeds. The case presents no question as to the rights of these sureties against those of the guardian upon his original bond.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcwhinney-v-swisher-ohio-1898.