Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/McVoy v. Baumann

McVoy v. Baumann

125 A. 484, 95 N.J. Eq. 335, 10 Stock. 335, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 735
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 4, 1923·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appeal from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — The Chief - Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Mintuen, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, HepPBNHEIMEE, GARDNER, ACKERS ON, VAN BuSKIEK, CLARK— 12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McVoy v. Baumann, 125 A. 484, 95 N.J. Eq. 335, 10 Stock. 335, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 735 (N.J. 1923).

125 A. 484 (McVoy v. Baumann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baumann v. Naugle
127 A. 263 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)
Naugle v. Baumann
127 A. 267 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)