Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/McVoy v. Baumann

McVoy v. Baumann

125 A. 484, 95 N.J. Eq. 335, 10 Stock. 335, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 735
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 4, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 125 A. 484 (McVoy v. Baumann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McVoy v. Baumann, 125 A. 484, 95 N.J. Eq. 335, 10 Stock. 335, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 735 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appeal from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — The Chief - Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Mintuen, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, HepPBNHEIMEE, GARDNER, ACKERS ON, VAN BuSKIEK, CLARK— 12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baumann v. Naugle
127 A. 263 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)
Naugle v. Baumann
127 A. 267 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A. 484, 95 N.J. Eq. 335, 10 Stock. 335, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcvoy-v-baumann-nj-1923.