McVity v. Stanton
13 N.Y.S. 914, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1735
Opinion
Upon careful consideration of the opinions in Preston v. Hencken, 9 Abb. N. C. 68, and in Williams v. Folsom,, 3 N. Y. Supp. 681, 5 N. Y Supp. 211, we are clear that the reasoning of the learned chief judge in the decision appealed from proceeds upon the more solid grounds, and conducts to the more consistent and satisfactory conclusion. Accordingly the order is-affirmed on the opinion at special term. Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McVity v. Stanton, 13 N.Y.S. 914, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1735 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
13 N.Y.S. 914 (McVity v. Stanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Folsom
3 N.Y.S. 681 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Preston v. Hencken
9 Abb. N. Cas. 68 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1880)