McVickar v. Taylor

Supreme Court of New Jersey

McVickar v. Taylor

187 A. 144, 121 N.J. Eq. 111

DecidedOctober 5, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A. 144 (McVickar v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McVickar v. Taylor, 187 A. 144, 121 N.J. Eq. 111 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a decree of the court of chancery in a foreclosure suit. The defendants admitted the execution and delivery of the bond and mortgage, but denied there was any consideration therefor, or that any money or thing of value was ever paid or received thereon.

The vice-chancellor found no merit in the defendants’ contention, and we think there was ample proof to support this conclusion.

The decree is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a decree of the court of chancery in a foreclosure suit. The defendants admitted the execution and delivery of the bond and mortgage, but denied there was any consideration therefor, or that any money or thing of value was ever paid or received thereon.

The vice-chancellor found no merit in the defendants’ contention, and we think there was ample proof to support this conclusion.

The decree is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A. 144, 121 N.J. Eq. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcvickar-v-taylor-nj-1936.