McVey v. Mosby

Appellate Court of Illinois

McVey v. Mosby

55 Ill. App. 628, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 491

DecidedOctober 29, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Ill. App. 628 (McVey v. Mosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McVey v. Mosby, 55 Ill. App. 628, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 491 (Ill. Ct. App. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In an action before a justice of the peace, the appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant upon a demand for wages as a laborer upon the latter’s farm. The appellant appealed to the Circuit Court and there the appellee, upon a trial before a jury, again prevailed, and the appellant appealed to this court. The testimony produced to the jury was conflicting, and its weight and value depended to some extent upon the credit accorded to the parties as witnesses. It is not complained that the court erred in instructing the jury or otherwise in the course of the trial. We have carefully considered the testimony and can not say that it is insufficient to support the verdict.

There is no error demanding interference upon our part with the conclusion reached by the jury.

The judgment must be, and is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In an action before a justice of the peace, the appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant upon a demand for wages as a laborer upon the latter’s farm. The appellant appealed to the Circuit Court and there the appellee, upon a trial before a jury, again prevailed, and the appellant appealed to this court. The testimony produced to the jury was conflicting, and its weight and value depended to some extent upon the credit accorded to the parties as witnesses. It is not complained that the court erred in instructing the jury or otherwise in the course of the trial. We have carefully considered the testimony and can not say that it is insufficient to support the verdict.

There is no error demanding interference upon our part with the conclusion reached by the jury.

The judgment must be, and is, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Ill. App. 628, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcvey-v-mosby-illappct-1894.