McVey (ID 100793) v. Jones

CourtDistrict Court, D. Kansas
DecidedNovember 1, 2019
Docket5:19-cv-03169
StatusUnknown

This text of McVey (ID 100793) v. Jones (McVey (ID 100793) v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McVey (ID 100793) v. Jones, (D. Kan. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

LARRY W. MCVEY, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 19-3169-SAC

(FNU) JONES, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 4.) On September 27, 2019, the Court entered a Notice of Deficiency (Doc. 5) granting Plaintiff until October 28, 2019, to provide the financial information required to support his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 18 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff has not provided the financial information by the deadline. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “authorizes a district court, upon a defendant’s motion, to order the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or ‘a court order.’” Young v. U.S., 316 F. App’x 764, 771 (10th Cir. 2009) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)). “This rule has been interpreted as permitting district courts to dismiss actions sua sponte when one of these conditions is met.” Id. (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630–31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)). “In addition, it is well established in this circuit that a district court is not obligated to follow any particular procedures when dismissing an action without prejudice under Rule 41(b).” Young, 316 F. App’x at 771–72 (citations omitted). Plaintiff has failed to provide the financial information by the deadline. Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this matter is dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (Doc. 4) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated November 1, 2019, in Topeka, Kansas. s/ Sam A. Crow Sam A. Crow U.S. Senior District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Link v. Wabash Railroad
370 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Olsen v. Mapes
333 F.3d 1199 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
Young v. United States
316 F. App'x 764 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McVey (ID 100793) v. Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcvey-id-100793-v-jones-ksd-2019.