Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/McVeigh v. State

McVeigh v. State

139 S.W.3d 238, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2004 WL 1660390
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 27, 2004
DocketWD 62518
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 S.W.3d 238 (McVeigh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McVeigh v. State, 139 S.W.3d 238, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2004 WL 1660390 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert McVeigh appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. McVeigh alleges his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to a redirect examination that went beyond the scope of cross-examination. Upon review of the record, we affirm the denial of post-conviction relief because McVeigh was not prejudiced by his counsel’s conduct. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our de- *239 cisión because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. State
139 S.W.3d 238 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.W.3d 238, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2004 WL 1660390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcveigh-v-state-moctapp-2004.