McVeigh v. State

139 S.W.3d 238, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2004 WL 1660390
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 27, 2004·No. WD 62518·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert McVeigh appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. McVeigh alleges his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to a redirect examination that went beyond the scope of cross-examination. Upon review of the record, we affirm the denial of post-conviction relief because McVeigh was not prejudiced by his counsel’s conduct. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our de- *239 cisión because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McVeigh v. State, 139 S.W.3d 238, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2004 WL 1660390 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

139 S.W.3d 238 (McVeigh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaw v. State
139 S.W.3d 238 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)