McVeigh v. Messersmith

16 F. Cas. 351, 5 D.C. 316, 5 Cranch 316
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided October 15, 1837·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The Court

(Cranch, C. J.,

contra,) gave the instruction asked by Mr. Semmes, and refused that asked by Mr. Taylor.

Cranch, C.J., was of opinion that it ought to be left to the [317]*317jury to say what was the extent and object of the plaintiff’s examination of the bacon, and whether he meant to rely upon that examination or upon the warranty.

Verdict for defendant.

Motion for new trial overruled.

Grange, C. J., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McVeigh v. Messersmith, 16 F. Cas. 351, 5 D.C. 316, 5 Cranch 316 (circtddc 1837).

16 F. Cas. 351 (McVeigh v. Messersmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Todd v. State
101 N.E.2d 45 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1951)
Silver v. State
9 S.W.2d 358 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Illinois v. Illinois Central Railroad
184 U.S. 77 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Roberts v. Haggart
29 N.W. 656 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1886)
Chambers v. Hodges
3 Tex. 517 (Texas Supreme Court, 1848)
Ex Parte Sibbald v. United States
37 U.S. 488 (Supreme Court, 1838)