Home/Superior Court of Pennsylvania/McVeagh v. Bass

McVeagh v. Bass

168 A. 777, 110 Pa. Super. 379, 1933 Pa. Super. LEXIS 69
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 13, 1933
DocketAppeal 298
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 168 A. 777 (McVeagh v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McVeagh v. Bass, 168 A. 777, 110 Pa. Super. 379, 1933 Pa. Super. LEXIS 69 (Pa. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The opinion of the learned court below, filed pursuant to Rule 58, fully justifies its action in entering judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. If, as may be possible, the plaintiff, and her daughter testifying on her behalf, exaggerated the darkness in the defendant’s store, she must accept the consequences necessarily resulting from that testimony. ■

The judgment is affirmed on the. opinion of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Just v. Sons of Italy Hall
368 A.2d 308 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Slobodzian v. Beighley
164 A.2d 923 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Carns v. Noel
70 A.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Polm v. Hession
363 Pa. 494 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Bartek v. Grossman
52 A.2d 209 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Vale v. Indiana County Theaters Co.
120 F.2d 495 (Third Circuit, 1941)
Hixenbaugh Et Vir. v. McCrory Co.
20 A.2d 910 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Fay v. 900 North 63d Street Corp.
9 A.2d 483 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Brusseau v. Selmo
281 N.W. 580 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)
Berrien v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
3 A.2d 18 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.
2 A.2d 831 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Hardman v. Stanley Co. of America
189 A. 886 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
183 A. 113 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
185 A. 613 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Modony v. Megdal
178 A. 395 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Shuster v. Jaffola & Mark, Inc.
22 Pa. D. & C. 556 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A. 777, 110 Pa. Super. 379, 1933 Pa. Super. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcveagh-v-bass-pasuperct-1933.