McVay v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McVay v. State

133 So. 749, 24 Ala. App. 250, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 252

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1931·No. 8 Div. 223.·Published

Opinion

*251 RICE, J.

Illegal possession of whisky. Exception to the action of. the court, overruling defendant’s (appellant’s) motion for a new trial, is not noted in the bill of exceptions. Where this is true, said action cannot be here reviewed.

There are no questions of importance, apparent. The few exceptions reserved on the taking of testimony have each been examined. Each of them is patently without merit.

Finding nowhere prejudicial error, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*251 RICE, J.

Illegal possession of whisky. Exception to the action of. the court, overruling defendant’s (appellant’s) motion for a new trial, is not noted in the bill of exceptions. Where this is true, said action cannot be here reviewed.

There are no questions of importance, apparent. The few exceptions reserved on the taking of testimony have each been examined. Each of them is patently without merit.

Finding nowhere prejudicial error, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McVay v. State, 133 So. 749, 24 Ala. App. 250, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 252 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

133 So. 749 (McVay v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.