McTavish, Frobisher v. Denning
This text of 1 Ant. N.P. Cas. 155 (McTavish, Frobisher v. Denning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The witness must answer the question proposed to him. The compromise was not a'matter confidential in its nature, but was made public by communication to the creditors. He is exempted from disclosing any confidential communications made to him as counsel in any cause then actually commenced or expected to be commenced. Yide Phillips’ Law of Ev. 192.
Hopkins and Badcliff, for plaintiffs.
Pendleton, for defendant. '
Tide post, Mount v. Bogert, and the note to that case; also, Anshon’s Law Student, 213,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ant. N.P. Cas. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mctavish-frobisher-v-denning-nysupct-1809.