McTague v. Finnegan

55 N.J. Eq. 588
New Jersey Court of Chancery·Decided March 15, 1897·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the chancellor.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Collins, Depul, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert.,- Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McTague v. Finnegan, 55 N.J. Eq. 588 (N.J. Ct. App. 1897).

55 N.J. Eq. 588 (McTague v. Finnegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. Risdon
55 A.2d 398 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Ehling v. Diebert
15 A.2d 655 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1940)
Wolf v. Palisades Trust Guaranty Co.
190 A. 94 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Burdick v. Grimshaw
168 A. 186 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)