Mctague v. Chase Bank

S.D. New York

Mctague v. Chase Bank

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 26, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-09202·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL MCTAGUE, Plaintiff, y 23-CV-9202 (DEH) CHASE BANK, ORDER Defendant.

DALE E. HO, United States District Judge: The Court directs Defendant Chase Bank to file a letter not to exceed three (3) pages by November 16, 2023. The letter shall address whether there is subject-matter jurisdiction and whether state removal is proper, relying on binding case law. It is well established that “[w]hen a requirement goes to subject-matter jurisdiction, courts are obligated to consider sua sponte issues that the parties have disclaimed or have not presented.” Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 141 (2012). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 26, 2023 New York, New York

DALE E. HO United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL MCTAGUE, Plaintiff, y 23-CV-9202 (DEH) CHASE BANK, ORDER Defendant.

DALE E. HO, United States District Judge: The Court directs Defendant Chase Bank to file a letter not to exceed three (3) pages by November 16, 2023. The letter shall address whether there is subject-matter jurisdiction and whether state removal is proper, relying on binding case law. It is well established that “[w]hen a requirement goes to subject-matter jurisdiction, courts are obligated to consider sua sponte issues that the parties have disclaimed or have not presented.” Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 141 (2012). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 26, 2023 New York, New York

DALE E. HO United States District Judge

Mctague v. Chase Bank, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Mctague v. Chase Bank (Mctague v. Chase Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related