Home/New York Court of Appeals/McSweeney v. . Melen

McSweeney v. . Melen

142 N.E. 324, 236 N.Y. 660, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1120
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 23, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 142 N.E. 324 (McSweeney v. . Melen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McSweeney v. . Melen, 142 N.E. 324, 236 N.Y. 660, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1120 (N.Y. 1923).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; questions certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Crane, J., dissenting: On the uncontradicted evidence an agreement for settlement was made and partially executed by the plaintiff and he is estopped from maintaining this action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 N.E. 324, 236 N.Y. 660, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcsweeney-v-melen-ny-1923.