McSweeney v. Equitable Trust Co.
315 U.S. 785, 62 S. Ct. 805
This text of 315 U.S. 785 (McSweeney v. Equitable Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McSweeney v. Equitable Trust Co., 315 U.S. 785, 62 S. Ct. 805 (1942).
Opinion
The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment was based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Enterprise Irrigation Dist. v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157; Utley v. St. Petersburg, 292 U. S. 106, 111-112.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co.
243 U.S. 157 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Utley v. St. Petersburg
292 U.S. 106 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
315 U.S. 785, 62 S. Ct. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcsweeney-v-equitable-trust-co-scotus-1942.