McSwain v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McSwain v. State

1921 OK CR 232, 202 P. 1118, 20 Okla. Crim. 230, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 172

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 5, 1921

DocketNo. A-3805.

StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK CR 232 (McSwain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McSwain v. State, 1921 OK CR 232, 202 P. 1118, 20 Okla. Crim. 230, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 172 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charles McSwain, Jr., was convicted on a charge that he did unlawfully sell to one Guy Woody one-half pint of alcohol for the price of $1.50, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $50 and the costs. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on July 3, 1920, petition in error with ease-made. No brief has been filed, and plaintiff in error is not represented in this court by counsel. An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict and judgment of conviction and that no reversible error was committed' on the trial. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charles McSwain, Jr., was convicted on a charge that he did unlawfully sell to one Guy Woody one-half pint of alcohol for the price of $1.50, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $50 and the costs. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on July 3, 1920, petition in error with ease-made. No brief has been filed, and plaintiff in error is not represented in this court by counsel. An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict and judgment of conviction and that no reversible error was committed' on the trial. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1921 OK CR 232, 202 P. 1118, 20 Okla. Crim. 230, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcswain-v-state-oklacrimapp-1921.