McSwain Hardwood Floor v. Haboush, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2004)

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2004·No. Appeal No. C-030893.·Unpublished

Opinion

JUDGMENT ENTRY.
This appeal is considered on the accelerated calendar under App. R. 11.1(E) and Loc. R. 12, and this Judgment Entry shall not be considered an Opinion of the Court pursuant to S.Ct. R.Rep.Op. 3.

The assignment of error is overruled. "McSwain Hardwood Floor" is not a fictitious name under R.C. 1329.01 and 1329.10, because it uses the true surname of its sole principal and no other name. See Duris Enterprises v. Moore (1983), 9 Ohio App.3d 99,458 N.E.2d 451, citing Czatt v. Case (1899), 61 Ohio St. 392,55 N.E. 1004, syllabus.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App. R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App. R. 24.

Doan, P.J., Hildebrandt and Painter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McSwain Hardwood Floor v. Haboush, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2004), (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).

McSwain Hardwood Floor v. Haboush, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2004) (McSwain Hardwood Floor v. Haboush, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2004)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duris Enterprises v. Moore
458 N.E.2d 451 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1983)
Kern v. Kern
55 N.E. 1004 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1900)