McSurely Et Al. v. Ratliff

389 U.S. 949, 88 S. Ct. 313, 19 L. Ed. 2d 358, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 341
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 10, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 389 U.S. 949 (McSurely Et Al. v. Ratliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McSurely Et Al. v. Ratliff, 389 U.S. 949, 88 S. Ct. 313, 19 L. Ed. 2d 358, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 341 (1967).

Opinion

The application for emergency relief presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, granted to the extent that the seized documents shall remain in their present custody pending further proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.

This order is conditioned upon the applicants’ presentation, within five days, to such District Court of any objections they may have to the validity of the subpoena duces tecum issued by the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations of the United States Senate and shall remain in effect pending the ruling of such District Court upon any such objections as may be presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 U.S. 949, 88 S. Ct. 313, 19 L. Ed. 2d 358, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcsurely-et-al-v-ratliff-scotus-1967.