McStea v. Boyd

21 La. Ann. 501
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 15, 1869·No. No. 43·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Howeix, J.

One of the defendant^, Frederic]* A. Blanks, has appealed from a judgment against h.iiij. and Iris, codefendant on three promissory notes, due respectively on thirteenth December, I860, first [502] January and thirteenth. April, 1861, and against which they pleaded the prescription of five years. Citation was served on the appellant on the twenty-second September, 1866, more than five years after the maturity of each note and according to the settled jurisprudence and the law of this State, the plea is well taken. See act fifth March, 1852, p. 90, § 3; Smith v. Stewart, 21 A. 75; Rabel v. Pourcieau, 20 A. 131.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment herein against Frederick A. Blanks be reversed, that there be judgment in his favor on plaintiff’s demand, with costs in both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McStea v. Boyd, 21 La. Ann. 501 (La. 1869).

21 La. Ann. 501 (McStea v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bischoff
84 So. 41 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1919)