McSparran v. Subers

Third Circuit

McSparran v. Subers

356 F.2d 983

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 18, 1966·No. Nos. 15476-15480·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that as to the merits, with particular reference to the primary questions of liability of appellants, the first trial of these suits was without substantial error and that the issues were properly submitted to the jury.

We further find that the refusal of the trial judge to mold the verdicts in these causes after the first trial thereof was within his discretion.

The judgments in these cases will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find that as to the merits, with particular reference to the primary questions of liability of appellants, the first trial of these suits was without substantial error and that the issues were properly submitted to the jury.

We further find that the refusal of the trial judge to mold the verdicts in these causes after the first trial thereof was within his discretion.

The judgments in these cases will be affirmed.

McSparran v. Subers, 356 F.2d 983 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

356 F.2d 983 (McSparran v. Subers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related