McSparran v. Subers

Third Circuit

McSparran v. Subers

356 F.2d 983

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 18, 1966

DocketNos. 15476-15480

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 356 F.2d 983 (McSparran v. Subers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McSparran v. Subers, 356 F.2d 983 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that as to the merits, with particular reference to the primary questions of liability of appellants, the first trial of these suits was without substantial error and that the issues were properly submitted to the jury.

We further find that the refusal of the trial judge to mold the verdicts in these causes after the first trial thereof was within his discretion.

The judgments in these cases will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find that as to the merits, with particular reference to the primary questions of liability of appellants, the first trial of these suits was without substantial error and that the issues were properly submitted to the jury.

We further find that the refusal of the trial judge to mold the verdicts in these causes after the first trial thereof was within his discretion.

The judgments in these cases will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 F.2d 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcsparran-v-subers-ca3-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack