McSorley v. Prague
18 N.Y.S. 955
This text of 18 N.Y.S. 955 (McSorley v. Prague) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McSorley v. Prague, 18 N.Y.S. 955 (superctny 1892).
Opinion
We find no errors in the rulings of sufficient weight to warrant a reversal. The testimony satisfactorily sustains the findings of the referee, and justifies the judgment rendered. For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the referee, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 N.Y.S. 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcsorley-v-prague-superctny-1892.