McShane v. State
This text of 584 P.2d 707 (McShane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[670]*670OPINION
A jury found McShane guilty of involuntary manslaughter, and judgment has duly been entered thereon. The information alleged that the victim was killed by McShane in the commission of the unlawful act of operating his automobile in excess of the posted speed limit, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in the wrong lane of traffic and without maintaining a proper brake system.
The appellant contends that the jury should have been instructed on the necessity of a unanimous verdict as to at least one of the alternative means charged, that is, speed, liquor, wrong lane, or lack of proper brakes. Such an instruction was not requested. The failure to so request is a waiver of his right to complain unless the instruction was so essential to his case that the court sua sponte was required to give it. Gebert v. State, 85 Nev. 331, 454 P.2d 897 (1969); Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967). Moreover, we note that evidence was introduced which would have allowed the jury to find that McShane drove his car at an excessive speed, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in the wrong lane of traffic and without proper brakes. Consequently, the propriety of such an instruction, had it been requested, is doubtful.
Affirmed.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
584 P.2d 707, 94 Nev. 669, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcshane-v-state-nev-1978.