McRoy v. Fife

Missouri Court of Appeals

McRoy v. Fife

410 S.W.3d 258, 2013 WL 4053145, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 941

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 13, 2013·No. No. WD 75799·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jesse McRoy appeals from a Memorandum, Order <& Judgment dismissing as moot his petition for declaratory relief against Gaye Fife, a records officer for the Northeast Correctional Center, in which Appellant asserted that his parole eligibility had been improperly calculated and requested a declaration to that effect. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jesse McRoy appeals from a Memorandum, Order <& Judgment dismissing as moot his petition for declaratory relief against Gaye Fife, a records officer for the Northeast Correctional Center, in which Appellant asserted that his parole eligibility had been improperly calculated and requested a declaration to that effect. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

McRoy v. Fife, 410 S.W.3d 258, 2013 WL 4053145, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 941 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

410 S.W.3d 258 (McRoy v. Fife) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.