McRoy, Danny Leon
This text of McRoy, Danny Leon (McRoy, Danny Leon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,384-01
EX PARTE DANNY LEON MCROY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 22,965-2016A IN THE 402ND DISTRICT COURT FROM WOOD COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of evading arrest
in a vehicle and sentenced to thirty-seven years’ imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals
affirmed his conviction. Mcroy v. State, 12-17-00131-CR (Tex. App.—Tyler May 23, 2018) (not
designated for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance
because he did not object to errors in the jury charge.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 2
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The
trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the
appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall make specific findings addressing whether
counsel was ineffective in not objecting to the parole law instruction and the lack of a burden of
proof instruction applicable to the deadly weapon finding. The trial court shall also make any other
findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of
Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: November 20, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McRoy, Danny Leon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcroy-danny-leon-texcrimapp-2019.