McRory v. Vinzant

Supreme Court of Alabama

McRory v. Vinzant

1 Minor 401

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 15, 1826·Published

Opinion

JUDGE Crenshaw.

The only matter relied on as Error in this case is, that the cause was discontinued.

The Record shews that after this Error intervened, both parties appeared and proceeded to trial. It has been settled by former decisions of this Court, that such appearance and subsequent proceedings cure the defect. It is the opinion of the majority of the Court that the judgment be affirmed.

Kennedy against Pickering, adm’r. ante, 137.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGE Crenshaw.

The only matter relied on as Error in this case is, that the cause was discontinued.

The Record shews that after this Error intervened, both parties appeared and proceeded to trial. It has been settled by former decisions of this Court, that such appearance and subsequent proceedings cure the defect. It is the opinion of the majority of the Court that the judgment be affirmed.

Kennedy against Pickering, adm’r. ante, 137.

McRory v. Vinzant, 1 Minor 401 (Ala. 1826).

Pincite

1 Minor 401 (McRory v. Vinzant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.