McReynolds v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McReynolds v. State

6 So. 2d 602, 30 Ala. App. 403, 1942 Ala. App. LEXIS 52

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 3, 1942

Docket2 Div. 696.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 So. 2d 602 (McReynolds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McReynolds v. State, 6 So. 2d 602, 30 Ala. App. 403, 1942 Ala. App. LEXIS 52 (Ala. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of grand larceny.

We see nothing to discuss. The record is regular in all respects. There were no exceptions reserved on the trial — or rulings by which an exception is presumed.

Appellant, after the trial, procured attorneys — 'two good ones — who have filed a brief here.

But their principal — in effect, sole — contention is that, appellant ought'to have a new trial because he had no counsel on his trial below.

*404 He asked for no such counsel, and cannot now complain.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI