McReynolds v. Office of Children & Family Services

546 U.S. 1027, 126 S. Ct. 748, 163 L. Ed. 2d 565, 74 U.S.L.W. 3323, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 8927
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 28, 2005
DocketNo. 05-6617
StatusPublished

This text of 546 U.S. 1027 (McReynolds v. Office of Children & Family Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McReynolds v. Office of Children & Family Services, 546 U.S. 1027, 126 S. Ct. 748, 163 L. Ed. 2d 565, 74 U.S.L.W. 3323, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 8927 (2005).

Opinion

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noneriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

JUSTICE STEVENS dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 U.S. 1027, 126 S. Ct. 748, 163 L. Ed. 2d 565, 74 U.S.L.W. 3323, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 8927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcreynolds-v-office-of-children-family-services-scotus-2005.