McRae v. . Williams

52 N.C. 430
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 52 N.C. 430 (McRae v. . Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McRae v. . Williams, 52 N.C. 430 (N.C. 1860).

Opinion

Pearson, C. J.

The legal effect, of the deed, executed by Williams to Murphy McRae, was to pass to him an estate for his own life. There is nothing to support the notion, that a deed may be color of title, so as to have effect beyond the estate which it professes to pass. It is clear, that the possession of Murphy McRae, could not operate in respect to Williams as an adverse possession, during the continuance of the life-estate, created by the deed from Williams to McRae.

*431 If it was the object of the parties, to create a fee simple estate, and the purpose was defeated by the omission of the word “ heirs,” relief may be obtained in a court of Equity, by the correction of the mistake in the deed; but it cannot be effected by a short cut, in a court of Law. These questions are too plain to admit of argument. There is no error.

Pee Cueiam,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dorman v. . Goodman
196 S.E. 352 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Wyman v. Walker
58 So. 403 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)
Carson v. . Carson
30 S.E. 4 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 N.C. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcrae-v-williams-nc-1860.