McRae v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McRae v. State

592 So. 2d 803, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 907, 1992 WL 20014

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 1992

DocketNo. 91-00678

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 803 (McRae v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McRae v. State, 592 So. 2d 803, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 907, 1992 WL 20014 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s sentences are affirmed. See Manuel v. State, 582 So.2d 823 (Fla.2d DCA 1991); Jackson v. State, 556 So.2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We strike special condition number six contained in the written orders of probation because that condition was not announced at sentencing. See Williams v. State, 542 So.2d 479 (Fla.2d DCA 1989).

FRANK, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s sentences are affirmed. See Manuel v. State, 582 So.2d 823 (Fla.2d DCA 1991); Jackson v. State, 556 So.2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We strike special condition number six contained in the written orders of probation because that condition was not announced at sentencing. See Williams v. State, 542 So.2d 479 (Fla.2d DCA 1989).

FRANK, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 803, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 907, 1992 WL 20014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcrae-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack