McRae v. Moore

224 S.E.2d 696, 29 N.C. App. 507, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2553
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided May 19, 1976·No. No. 7613DC1·Published

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

The court made no adjudication of defendants’ counterclaim for damages allegedly resulting because plaintiffs filed a lis pendens on the property after the expiration of the option, which prevented defendants “from selling their property or from using it as collateral to obtain money badly needed in their business affairs.” Thus, the judgment from which plaintiffs appeal adjudicates fewer than all the claims of the parties.

Since the trial court made no determination that “there is no just reason for delay,” the judgment “does not terminate the [509] action as to any of the claims,” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b), and is not now appealable. Durham v. Creech, 25 N.C. App. 721, 214 S.E. 2d 612 (1975) ; Leasing, Inc. v. Dan-Cleve Corp., 25 N.C. App. 18, 212 S.E. 2d 41 (1975), cert. denied 288 N.C. 241, 216 S.E. 2d 910 (1975) ; Arnold v. Howard, 24 N.C. App. 255, 210 S.E. 2d 492 (1974).

Appeal dismissed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Clark concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McRae v. Moore, 224 S.E.2d 696, 29 N.C. App. 507, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2553 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976).

224 S.E.2d 696 (McRae v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durham v. Creech
214 S.E.2d 612 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Arnold v. Howard
210 S.E.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
NYTCO LEASING, INC. v. Dan-Cleve Corporation
212 S.E.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)