McRae v. Central Prince Georges County

405 F. App'x 800
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2010
DocketNo. 10-1807
StatusPublished

This text of 405 F. App'x 800 (McRae v. Central Prince Georges County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McRae v. Central Prince Georges County, 405 F. App'x 800 (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randy McRae appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to remand and imposing sanctions against McRae. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McRae v. Central Prince Georges County CDC, No. 8:10-cv-00239-PJM, 2010 WL 2651634 (D. Md. June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 F. App'x 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcrae-v-central-prince-georges-county-ca4-2010.