McRae v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

McRae v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co.

162 S.E. 713, 174 Ga. 320, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 45

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 10, 1932

DocketNo. 8414

StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 713 (McRae v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McRae v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co., 162 S.E. 713, 174 Ga. 320, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 45 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Applying the rulings made by this court in the case of Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. Tidwell, 173 Ga. 499 (160 S. E. 620), to the controlling questions in the present case as they are made by the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not err in refusing an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., and Himes, J., who dissent. Gilbert, J., co.ncurs specially for reasons stated in his special concurrence in the case cited above.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

Applying the rulings made by this court in the case of Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. Tidwell, 173 Ga. 499 (160 S. E. 620), to the controlling questions in the present case as they are made by the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not err in refusing an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., and Himes, J., who dissent. Gilbert, J., co.ncurs specially for reasons stated in his special concurrence in the case cited above.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 S.E. 713, 174 Ga. 320, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcrae-v-atlanta-title-trust-co-ga-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack