M'Crackin's Executors v. Samuels
This text of 16 Ky. 12 (M'Crackin's Executors v. Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court, by
IT appears that the point in issue between the parties is, whether or not the heirs of Charles Beall were of full age at the time the suit was instituted.
Upon the trial of this issue the plaintiff in the court below introduced testimony to prove that part of the children and heirs at law of Charles Beall, deceased, to whom the tract of land in the declaration mentioned was devised, were of full and lawful age; but, it being also proved that a part of the children of the said Beall were not of full age at the time of the commencement of the suit, it seems to this court that the judge erred in directing the jury that the issue was well proved for the plaintiff; because, as the issue extends generally to the heirs of Beall, without designating any particular number of the children by name or otherwise, the proof, as to part of the heirs, does not meet the issue.
Therefore, judgment reversed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ky. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcrackins-executors-v-samuels-kyctapp-1800.