McQuillen v. Pacific Transportation Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McQuillen v. Pacific Transportation Lines, Inc.

12 A.D.2d 883, 209 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13534

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 883 (McQuillen v. Pacific Transportation Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McQuillen v. Pacific Transportation Lines, Inc., 12 A.D.2d 883, 209 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment insofar as appealed from and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: In the case of Eugene McQuillen, as administrator, the verdict of the jury is contrary to and against the weight of evidence. In the case of Kathleen McQuillen, an infant, the verdict is inadequate. (Appeal by both plaintiffs from part of judgment and order of Erie Trial Term for no cause of action in the administrator’s action and in favor of the infant plaintiff, in an automobile negligence action. The order denied plaintiffs’ motions for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment insofar as appealed from and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: In the case of Eugene McQuillen, as administrator, the verdict of the jury is contrary to and against the weight of evidence. In the case of Kathleen McQuillen, an infant, the verdict is inadequate. (Appeal by both plaintiffs from part of judgment and order of Erie Trial Term for no cause of action in the administrator’s action and in favor of the infant plaintiff, in an automobile negligence action. The order denied plaintiffs’ motions for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 883, 209 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcquillen-v-pacific-transportation-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1961.