McQuillan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

86 N.Y.S. 1140
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 23, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Aside from the question whether the plaintiff showed himself free from contributory negligence, his evidence fails to establish negligence in the defendant. Upon this point the case at bar is identical with Meyerowitz v. Interurban St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 233. The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McQuillan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 86 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

86 N.Y.S. 1140 (McQuillan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyerowitz v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
84 N.Y.S. 233 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)