Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/McQuillan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

McQuillan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

86 N.Y.S. 1140
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 23, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.Y.S. 1140 (McQuillan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McQuillan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 86 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Aside from the question whether the plaintiff showed himself free from contributory negligence, his evidence fails to establish negligence in the defendant. Upon this point the case at bar is identical with Meyerowitz v. Interurban St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 233. The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meyerowitz v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
84 N.Y.S. 233 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 N.Y.S. 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcquillan-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1904.