McQuerter v. Office of Personnel Management

450 F. App'x 947
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 23, 2010·No. No. 2010-3064·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

The court treats the Kenya McQuerter’s letter, received by the court on December 28, 2009, as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous rejection of her petition for review as untimely. McQuerter also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

McQuerter filed an action at the Merit Systems Protection Board, challenging the Office of Personnel Management’s deter[948]*948mination that she was not entitled to a lump sum death benefit payment after the death of her father because she was not listed as a named beneficiary. The Administrative Judge issued an initial decision affirming OPM’s determination. McQuerter petitioned the full Board for review. The full Board denied review, and McQuerter received the Board’s final order denying review on October 6, 2009.

The court initially received McQuerter’s petition for review on December 8, 2009, or 63 days after her receipt of the Board’s final order. A petition for review must be received by the court within 60 days of receipt of the Board’s final order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McQuerter v. Office of Personnel Management, 450 F. App'x 947 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

450 F. App'x 947 (McQuerter v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowles v. Russell
551 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Jacinto S. Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management
931 F.2d 1544 (Federal Circuit, 1991)