McQueen v. State
903 So. 2d 256, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7635, 2005 WL 1498469
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McQueen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 848 So. 2d 1220 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Burrows v. State, 890 So.2d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 862 So.2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Arnold v. State, 566 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); LaMar v. State, 823 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). As this court did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review granted, No. SC04-174, 898 So.2d 81, 2005 WL 937726 (Fla. Apr. 1, 2005).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McQueen v. State, 903 So. 2d 256, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7635, 2005 WL 1498469 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
903 So. 2d 256 (McQueen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arnold v. State
566 So. 2d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Richardson v. State
884 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Burrows v. State
890 So. 2d 286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cook v. State
816 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
O'NEAL v. State
862 So. 2d 91 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
LaMar v. State
823 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)