McQueen v. Seidman
This text of 191 A.D.2d 339 (McQueen v. Seidman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered October 22, 1992, which dismissed the petitioner’s application brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination affirming the determination of Henry Phipps Plaza West rejecting petitioner’s application for an apartment in this Mitchell-Lama building, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent’s determination is rationally based upon petitioner’s history of nonpayment of rent at two previous residences (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, [340]*340231). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger, Ross and Kassal, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 A.D.2d 339, 595 N.Y.S.2d 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcqueen-v-seidman-nyappdiv-1993.