McQueen v. Held

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McQueen v. Held

61 A.D.2d 826, 402 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10291

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 826 (McQueen v. Held) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McQueen v. Held, 61 A.D.2d 826, 402 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the further prosecution of petitioner under Kings County Indictment No. 821-1977 or, in the alternative, to disqualify the respondent Justice from further participation in the event of a retrial. Petition granted to the extent that the retrial should be held before a Justice other than the respondent Held. Proceeding otherwise dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner in this proceeding was a codefendant of one Rudolph Drayton, whose petition for a writ of prohibition is being determined simultaneously herewith. The reasons set forth in the memorandum decision in that proceeding apply with equal force here. In addition, the petitioner here joined in the mistrial motion of his codefendant, although he was advised by the court that if he did not do so the trial would proceed as to both defendants and that the codefendant’s motion for a mistrial would be denied. Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the further prosecution of petitioner under Kings County Indictment No. 821-1977 or, in the alternative, to disqualify the respondent Justice from further participation in the event of a retrial. Petition granted to the extent that the retrial should be held before a Justice other than the respondent Held. Proceeding otherwise dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner in this proceeding was a codefendant of one Rudolph Drayton, whose petition for a writ of prohibition is being determined simultaneously herewith. The reasons set forth in the memorandum decision in that proceeding apply with equal force here. In addition, the petitioner here joined in the mistrial motion of his codefendant, although he was advised by the court that if he did not do so the trial would proceed as to both defendants and that the codefendant’s motion for a mistrial would be denied. Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 826, 402 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcqueen-v-held-nyappdiv-1978.